What Does the Doctor Remove After a Baby Loss

You know about how individuals gain command of the power of the State and then corruption that power like former US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some U.s.a. businesses.  He achieved this b y challenge Iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious globe security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush Great britain The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Call up how Bush-league was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the United states with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass devastation which did not be but which Blair claimed could exist deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Notice how they persuade u.s.a. we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save united states all if we trust them?

This trickery is non new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hour period.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came near every bit a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, especially diet and sanitation. The effect cannot exist owing to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

In that location was a nasty affliction called smallpox and it did impale people long agone.

This was peculiarly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading illness: London's start park built after rich feared affliction spread from slums Great britain The Contained By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the Land would continue them prophylactic from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could attain this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

At present you can read a relatively curt merely well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the big numbers of deaths caused past the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On whatsoever scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residuum of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [run across table below].  Leicester's approach also price far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruum.	Small-scale-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	xi.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Majestic Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving upwards vaccination)	1880-1908	one,206	61	v.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, then that they may exist compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I inquire, if the excessive modest-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—merely on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Minor-Pox Cases	Small-scale-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	one,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	four.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavour and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its kickoff. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection confronting contagious disease brainstorm?

Many medical and history books nowadays a uncomplicated tale of the origin of vaccination. About present the aforementioned basic tale of the brilliant ascertainment of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening affliction of that time – smallpox, or every bit it was oft called the speckled monster. In a recent and pop book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year old boy named James Phipps to examination his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, merely nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more than; once more, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a elementary and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[ii]

But legendary heroes, especially those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using pocket-size amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practise of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was merely a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do improve against the affliction than if they contracted information technology at some possibly less desirable time and place in the futurity.

The thought was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an functioning that could just be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The process did oftentimes aid protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was withal an estimated 2-v% that died as a result.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a xx-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to practice with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the bulk of society?

There was i major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and plant that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to terminate the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence information technology spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are plainly multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by nearly of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amidst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease thing that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He subsequently deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a examination to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Lodge, Jenner was ridiculed over his exercise.

Just he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned information technology than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where modest-pox had followed moo-cow-pox . . . [8]

From the kickoff there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by existence inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in back up of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was speedily embraced by many in the medical profession as the reply to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'south ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the stop of the twelvemonth 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-retainer to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summertime of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-size-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'southward role . . . died of pocket-size-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A study in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the aforementioned fatality rate as smallpox earlier vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a straight challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Minor Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the most practiced practitioners, is now alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, afterward vaccination, people nevertheless could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[xiii]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a doc to have spoken out confronting it as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the pocket-sized-pox. Information technology broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed shut to abode to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and oft severely; near to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lone, just fell upon groovy numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" grade, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but equally failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh textile direct from cows.[xvi]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was but smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new illness.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later enquiry determined that this was zero more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were also reports of deaths from other causes presently after vaccination. For example, a pare condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged ten weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could exist transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by ways of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At present I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to exist, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a prepare of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the neat 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph one). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to impale or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent dr. of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence fabricated past vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they volition get nigh a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did non vaccinate their children. Yet, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A peachy pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were 20-three thousand 4 hundred and lx-9 cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine yard 3 hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, half-dozen thousand eight hundred and 50-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and twenty-two k vaccinated persons have suffered from small-scale-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that betwixt 1870 and 1885 i one thousand thousand vaccinated persons died from small-scale-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the authorities and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Still, in that location were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would event in a terrible "massacre," specially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph ii). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a flow of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-sized-pox and far less affected by that affliction since information technology abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a safe procedure, it often acquired sickness or fifty-fifty death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph ii: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the Us. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed ane in 5 of its victims to ane that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as low as i in 380. The disease could notwithstanding kill, simply having become and then much milder, it was oftentimes mistaken for various other pox infections or pare eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the South and after gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for craven pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 commodity in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease rate was effectually 20%, as it had been historically. The tabular array also showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit fell off chop-chop, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. Every bit the mild form of smallpox replaced the archetype blazon, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly of import because information technology oftentimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced trivial in the style of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the class of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, at that place was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the last smallpox death in the U.s.a. in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of nine children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now beingness termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this illness was estimated by the authors to exist between i in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of 4 to 40%.[35] Even so, they acknowledged that virtually cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. In that location were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the upshot of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had merely been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The concluding smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, just since that time there accept been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged access, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother besides required treatment and virus was constitute all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 report idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a state with a modern health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays beyond the entire world?

In that location were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. Nosotros prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted fashion to deal with affliction, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is fabricated through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, Thousand.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small-scale pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in pocket-sized-pox than Belladonna in crimson fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterwards breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was equally usual.[forty]

In 1899 Dr. Howe likewise demonstrated vinegar'south power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used iii or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Club, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may at present be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem giddy, merely only because virtually people have been conditioned to have the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal'south (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the homo arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, basic, and blood vessels and also gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve equally mortar holding cells together and, as a issue, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilded miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living nigh entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour made into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed downward with copious librations of stiff coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, under a scorching dominicus, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Golden Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such every bit smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for just a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in bodily boxing or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 per centum of the full deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as crimson fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph five: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a key medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. Merely the true history shows the states a dissimilar reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is aught close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective retentiveness. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to yous?

More than data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Dr., Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
seven."The Do of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'due south Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'south Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Medico, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
fifteen.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
nineteen.Ephraim Cutter, Physician, "Partial Written report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the Usa," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wed, Apr 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. vi, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. nineteen, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Physician, "A Md'south Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, Apr sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. West. Hodge, Dr., "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Iii, no. xvi, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the do of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos Medico, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acid in Crimson Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January xv, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex'south College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Safe, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

What Does the Doctor Remove After a Baby Loss

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share :